top of page

Testimonials

This is what users say about xxlreloading.com and our service (in English).  We appreciate your feedback - please take a minute and leave your comment.

Comments (175)
Rated 4.496 out of 5 stars.
4.5 | 113 Ratings

Add a rating
Unknown member
11h ago
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

i haven't used your loading data yet, but you are in line with other data from different sources.

Like

Unknown member
5d ago

I am new to your site, so far so good, I like what I see, need to spend some more time to familiarize myself with it.

Like

Unknown member
6d ago
Rated 4 out of 5 stars.

Some of your dated is different from others .

Like

Unknown member
6d ago
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Excellent loading data for diverse cartridges. Thank You

Like

Unknown member
Dec 29, 2025

Very comprehensive and useful load data. I like to rifle customization feature -- cross correlate it with Quickload :-)

Like

Unknown member
Dec 27, 2025
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

XXL is a top website.

Like

Unknown member
Dec 25, 2025
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Sehr gute Seite. Manchmal etwas langsam im Laden der Daten. Ich denke das hängt vom Server ab. Ansonsten findet man hier alles was sich ein Wiederlader wünscht.

Umfangreiches Fachwissen von sehr vielen Profis.

Like

Unknown member
Dec 24, 2025
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Great value. Maybe slow sometimes, but always faster than me. Best tool I've found so far.

Like

Unknown member
Dec 12, 2025
Rated 3 out of 5 stars.

Site is relatively "slow". Sometimes drop down menu items don't load first time around. Some features don't load at all. "Help" and "Contact" are the worst. Load data is missing some of the newer powders. Some load data is significantly under rated. Common bullets are not listed. What is in the data bank is usually ok for starting/researching possible loads. Three star rating is low, but four star would be too high.

Like

Unknown member
Dec 12, 2025
Rated 1 out of 5 stars.

Wasted money. First, because of missing load data. Second, and that's the important part: loading data is very bad. It seems like all the load data is calculated and not derived from experience. Example? .224 | 55gr | Hornady FMJ BT with VV N140: The MAXIMUM load here is 1.7 grain BELOW the STARTING load recommended by VithtaVuori itself. Safe your money and use the official loading data from the manufacturers.

Like
schwob2
schwob2
Dec 16, 2025
Replying to

Thanks or the feedback. Please let us know what is missing - we are not aware of any source that has more lad data than us.


Then, you state that our load data is bad. The differences can be explained as follows and illustrate 2 things: 1. ALWAYS ensure you check your inputs and compare apples with apples and 2. Do not blindly trust manufacturer load data! Vithavouri states a max load for .224 | 55gr | Hornady FMJ BT, N140, caliber .223 Rem of 26.8 grains with a OAL of 2.244 ''. Unfortunately, they do not state the case capacity. However, the case capacity would need to be 33.5 GoW to fit the powder without it becoming a press load (you can calculate this with powder bulk density. A .223 brass has between 28.8 and 31 GoW case capacity so THIS MAX LOAD of 26.8 grains IS TOO MUCH just for this simple reason unless you accept a massive press load.

Our load data specifies every input variable. For the discussed combination, it is 10% safety buffer, a 28.8 GoW case capacity, an OAL of 2.226''. OF COURSE, THIS leads to significantly lower max loads. You can use our personalized load calculator to adjust these values. If you i.e. set safety buffer = 0 and case capacity to 31 GoW and OAL to 2.244, you get a max load of 25.5 grains at a 100% fill rate. If you allow for 110% fill rate, you get a massive press load and to the same number as Vithavouri states.

Like
bottom of page